|
|
| Forensic Loan Audits, Mortgage Compliance Audits |
Judges' Conflict in Interest?Can that Judge Evict you, so his Pension Fund makes more money?
|
| The 2010 Report lists the juicy details of all the Bank holdings and Mortgage-Backed Securities Holdings. |
|
Holdings of Mortgage-Backed Securities, Pages 50 to 78: Banc America, Bear Sterns, CHL (Coutnrywide), Citigroup, Countrywide, CWALT, CWABS, Credit Suisse, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac (almost 20 pages), GMAC, Ginnie Mae, Indymac, JPMorgan Chase, Lehmann, Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley, WaMu, Wells Fargo. |
Attorney Jailed Denied Rights for Exposing Judicial Corruption, Richard Fine Californiahttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wrUv6riFSRA |
Why Won't the ACLU Help Jailed Attorney Richard Fine?http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gyt1iCcSDfI |
RICHARD FINE JAILED ATTORNEY WHISTLEBLOWER Part 1 |
Attorney Richard Fine is out of JAIL 11-2010 .. At last |
Judges Must Disclose Interest over $1500 - CCP 170.5 |
Dr. Shirley Moore on CorruptionMySpace.com/DisclosureWatchus |
|
judicialmisconduct.blogspot.com "Los Angeles, April 21- in notice to Deputy Clerk of the US Supreme Court Gary Kemp, Dr Joseph Zernik, Los Angeles County resident and founder of Human Rights Alert, asked that Chief Justice Robert act pursuant to the Code of Conduct of US Judges, and secure the integrity of US Supreme Court docket in Application of Fine v Sheriff (09-A827). " The Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department employed unverified and unvalidated online public access system (OPAS) and unvalidated case management system (CMS) to present the false pretense that Richard Fine (1824367) was arrested and booked at and by the authority of the non-existent Municipal Court of San Pedro. · The Los Angeles Superior Court, where Mr Fine was in fact arrested, likewise employed unverified and unvalidated OPAS and unvalidated CMS, to present the false pretense of a March 4, 2009 Judgment for Contempt against Richard Fine in Marina v LA County (BS109420). In fact, such March 4, 2009 Judgment was never adequately verified by a judge, was never authenticated, and was never entered by the Los Angeles Superior Court as an honest valid and effectual Court Judgment. · The US District Court, Los Angeles, where Mr Fine filed a habeas corpus petition Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914), likewise employed unverified and unvalidated OPAS and unvalidated CMS, to present the false pretense of June 29, 2009 Judgment denying the habeas corpus petition. In fact, new records (NEFs - Notices of Electronic Filings) from the US District Court case discovered by Dr Zernik and specifically referenced in his filings with the US Supreme Court, [5] showed that the US District Court never authenticated such June 29, 2009 Judgment and never adequately noticed and served it on Richard Fine. · The US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit, falsely presented a June 30, 2009 Denial of Richard Fine’s Petition - Fine v Sheriff (09- 71692), and a February 12, 2010 Mandate from the Appeal - Fine v Sheriff (09- 09-56073) both were never adequately served, noticed or entered as valid records by the Courts. Accordingly, Dr Zernik’s April 20, 2010 papers filed with the US Supreme Court asked claimed that there was never any valid record as foundation for the imprisonment of Richard Fine, and that Richard Fine was therefore entitled to his immediate release. In addition, Dr Zernik requested that the US Supreme Court issue a mandate to lower courts to establish their OPASs and CMSs as validated systems in the Local Rules of Court, as required by law. |
So, What Can You Do?We suggest:1) get a Forensic Loan Audit to Find How the Lender Violated the Law. 2) get a Non Profit to suggest Short Sale to a Buyer you Know. 3) consider hiring a Lawyer to prepare and file a complaint. |
 |
Call Jim at (562) 867-3230 or
(at )
, for a FREE Evaluation for your Situation. |
| Powered By: |
|
|
|
|
|
